Scientist+Assessment

Famous Scientist Wanted Poster: Grading Rubric ............... || ............... || ** Written Requirements ** No factual errors found. || __**The information you presented was somewhat accurate. One fact was missing or not reported correctly**__. || I nformation was missing or was mostly wrong. Only one or two facts were found to be true. || The information you presented was completely inaccurate. || text by presenting the facts clearly in your own words. **__ || You kind of understood what you read in the informational text, which was evident through your fuzzy writing. A fact was not clearly discussed. || You understood very little of the meaning of what you read in the informational text. This was clear through copying of facts rather than a discussion of them. || You completely missed the meaning of the informational text. The text may have been above your reading level. || errors. **__ || There were three to five grammatical errors. || There were more than five grammatical errors. || technical presentation. || __**A good amount of time and effort went into this project. It was missing one or two technical presentation pieces. **__ || Some time and effort went into this project. However, there were incomplete and/or missing technical presention pieces that were carelessly over looked. || Little to no time and effort went into this project. It was carelessly thrown together. This is evident through the lack of technical presentation. ||
 * ** Basic Requirements Met? ** || ** Y ** || ** N ** ||
 * Name of the scientists is included || x
 * Dates born and died (or present if still living) || x || ||
 * Country where they were born || x || ||
 * Area of science studied || x || ||
 * Schooling || x || ||
 * Famous for || x || ||
 * Interesting fact or quote || x || ||
 * Web address || x || ||
 * Name/science period || || x ||
 * On wiki site || x || ||
 * Total: 9/ 10 **
 * ** 4 ** || ** 3 ** || ** 2 ** || ** 1 ** ||
 * The facts you presented was right on.
 * __** You stayed on the topic 100% of the time. **__ || You lost focus of the topic once, but corrected and got back on track. || You lost focus of the topic you were writing about a lot. || You didn't have a focus and the writing was completely off topic. ||
 * __** You demonstrated a complete understanding of the informational
 * There were no spelling errors. || __** There were one or two spelling errors. **__ || There were three to five spelling errors. || <span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">There were more than five spelling errors. ||
 * <span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">There were no grammatical errors. || __** <span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">There were one or two grammatical
 * It is obvious a lot of time went into this project. It is sound in

<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">**Total:__20/24__**

//Project Grade// 85%

Your poster was played out very neatly. Make sure you provide the full web address next time. I don't think that she studied plants and the Earth but if you show me a reliable site that says otherwise I will give you an extra point.